Here it is in black n white: I have never sold Real Estate or Rented apartments for anyone coming to Colombia, I have MADE ZERO $$ no money ever off any person coming to Colombia, I do not give tours nor do I receive any referral fee from anyone. I do have a few people whom I pass along your request to, but these services are not by me or any company I own. Too much of many of the reader of this site say otherwise, my personal friends here in Colombia whom know me, know this statement is true.
I decided to close any future referrals to anyone for anyone, your coming here, good luck your on your own.
TRY GOING TO ECUADOR !! Much better cities, cheaper, way too many expats all ready there to share your stories with, better and easier methods of getting low cost health care too. If your reading this do some research on Ecuador, you may find this a country better than Colombia.
If you still decide upon Colombia, I am easy to find, glad to share a cup of coffee share world travel stories and photography & video tips.
The truth is all of these are here in South America, Colombia, Ecuador, Costa Rica and Panama are all the same, close to the rainforest where these insect live.
BRING SEVERAL BOTTLES OF DEET. 50% will last 4 hours, 25% two hours, 100% unto 6 hours. Read the label.
How To Avoid Bug Bites
Cover exposed skin. Wear long-sleeved shirts, long pants, and hats,, plus a cotton neck scarf
Use an approved insect repellent. 100% DEET is only one that actually works. Spray on back of neck, arms, hands, ankles plus spray on your hands apply easy to face.
Use permethrin-treated clothing and gear. These items remain protected after several washings. Check the product information. If treating items yourself, follow the instructions carefully, and do not use permethrin directly on skin. Hats, shirts, pants, scarf, socks this was made for our military and actually works too, google it, sold on Amazon.
Sleep in air-conditioned or screened rooms.
Use a bed net if the sleeping area is exposed to the outdoors.
If bitten, avoid scratching the area. Apply hydrocortisone cream or calamine lotion and reduce the itching.
Prior to their journey, health professionals in your own country will advise travelers about necessary vaccines. The U.S. recommends the vaccine for travelers visiting regions lower than 2,300 m in elevation, in provinces east of the Andes Mountains. Yellow Fever shots are a good precaution.
ZIKA you only need to Google this virus to understand the danger.
The bite of the female Anopheles mosquito transmits malaria to humans.
Although the weekend’s Summit of the Americas in Panama City was highlighted by a handshake between Cuba’s Raul Castro and the U.S. President Barack Obama, there were also emotional exchanges between several Latin American leaders and Obama.
Latin America Leaders exchange emotional words with Obama
One of the most intense came on Saturday when Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa told Obama that Latin America will no longer accept U.S. intervention in its affairs.
“Our people will never again accept the interference and intervention of the United States. Our memory is still torn by the abuse and violence of the past,” Correa said. “Panama is a good example of this with the December 1989 U.S. invasion, which caused the deaths of thousands of innocent people, so that the U.S. could arrest the bloody dictator that it installed into power,” he said.
Correa continued, personally addressing Obama: “Your government is still trying to intervene in our affairs as evidenced by your executive order that declared Venezuela a threat to your national security. It is also evidenced by officials from your office asking the U.S. Congress for money to defend freedom of expression in Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador and Nicaragua,” he said. “We totally reject this act of arrogance,” he added.
Apparently caught off guard, Obama at first said he was not prepared to respond, but then said the U.S. had not always respected Latin American rights in past. “We admit this but we must move on and not be trapped in old ideology,” Obama said. “At least I’m not trapped in it.”
Obama suggested that the U.S. is a convenient scapegoat for problems not of its own making. “This kind of thinking will not bring progress. It will not educate our children or feed those who don’t have enough to eat,” he said.
Obama added that he was “open to the history lessons” he was receiving at the summit. “My country does not presume to be perfect but we can learn from your experience as well as our own and we can work together for a better future,” he said.
Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa said that the government of Venezuela can count on Ecuador’s help to facilitate a solution and to reduce the current tension between the United States and Venezuela.
“If we can serve as mediators to resolve by peaceful means, through dialogue, Venezuela knows it can count on us. We will be where we need,” Correa said Friday during a television interview. The Venezuelan government has asked Ecuador to lead a group of facilitators to initiate dialogue with the US, as decided at a meeting of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas (ALBA) on Tuesday in Caracas.
Ecuador has accepted the Caracas approach, but also stressed its position that Washington’s executive order, which declares the internal situation in Venezuela as an “extraordinary threat” to U.S. safety, is an interference in Venezuelan politics.
Correa was asked during the interview whether Ecuador should suggest possible concessions to the parties during the mediation process, if a mediation does materialize. Ecuador’s president asked in return: “What concession has Venezuela to make to the U.S.? The United States is practicing a blatant interference that violates American law, against international law that prohibits a country to interfere in each other’s internal problems. The problems of Venezuela are for Venezuelans to solve,” and after ensuring that, there must be “zero tolerance for such interference.”
Correa went on further to say that an Executive Order from Washington, “was always the prelude to invasions. Latin America has a very sad story about it,” he recalled. “Who could believe such nonsense? [contained in the Executive Order]” Rather, it’s that Executive Order that proves Washington is “a serious threat” against the Venezuelan government.
However, Correa forecasted a “very difficult military intervention” since “boots and bombings are a thing of the past” but that now it is “more effective to destabilize a country and maybe that is what the U.S. is looking to accomplish in this situation with the Venezuelan government.” The “isolation, these sanctions, economic, media manipulation, etc.,” are part of these subtle ways to destabilize governments,” he added. The Ecuadorian president said that Venezuela has “endured intense political, economic and media harassment for several years” and emphasized that the Executive Order issued by the U.S. Government has only added to that situation.
However, Correa stressed that the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) had passed a resolution in its meeting last week asking the U.S. to repeal the Executive Order against Venezuela. “Just the fact that UNASUR has formed a unanimous decision, means that something has changed irreversibly in Latin America,” a region which “will no longer accept impositions from anyone,” said Correa.
Here is another opition to anyone thinking about retirement in Colombia, is to look at Ecuador too. Many things are very similar to life in Colombia, cost of living, quality of life, health care and of course plenty of farmers markets too.
The ABC News team did a great video on telling about the life in Cuenca Ecuador, without another moment, check out this video too. I think Colombia is the best place on earth you only need to make up your own mind to see which country is best for you.
Nestled in the Andes Mountains is a kind of paradise that has lured thousands of Americans away from home.Cuenca, Ecuador, may be a place many people have never heard of. But it’s become a city teaming with retirees from all over the United States, drawn there by quality health care, a booming social scene and a low cost of living that makes their nest eggs suddenly seem golden.Jan and Paul Cottage moved to Cuenca from Houston, Texas about a year ago. But it was not a future they were counting on when they began discussing retirement several years ago.”I think we are the least likely people to end up in Ecuador,” Jan Cottage said. “We owned a time share in New Mexico. That’s where I thought we would always retire.”But when Jan Cottage, 61, lost her job and the company Paul Cottage, 67, owned was downsized, they realized they were looking at an early retirement with less money than they had planned on. So he got on the computer and started researching.”So when he comes home and says, ‘What do you think about Ecuador?’ I just burst into tears,” Jan Cottage said, smiling now at the memory. “You could see him go, ‘Oh, this is not good.’ And so he kind of went away and didn’t mention it again for several months.”She said she could have looked for a new job, but knew at her age the chance of finding something at her same salary was slim.”It’s real hard when you’re in your mid-50s to find another job. You’re competing with very well-qualified people that may be 30, 35 years old,” she said.Despite her initial hesitation, the couple kept researching the possibility of retiring overseas, knowing that if they stayed in the United States, even moving to a less expensive city, they would be strapped by high health care costs, property taxes and other fixed costs like utilities and gas.”We all know people who have retired and they spend a great majority of their time watching television,” Jan Cottage said. “We wanted to make sure that wasn’t us.”They went to Costa Rica on vacation but decided it wasn’t a place they wanted to live. They also visited Panama and Mexico.Then they flew to Ecuador and found it had just what they were looking for: a moderate climate where temperatures didn’t typically climb out of the 70s, an active art and music scene, and plenty of places to hike and exercise.They went back for a second trip, this one for five weeks, where they tested what it would be like to live in Cuenca. They took Spanish lessons and learned to navigate the cobblestone streets. Then they moved there for good.The Cottages, who don’t have any children, said they don’t miss much about their life in the U.S. aside from their friends. Their property taxes were slashed from about $10,000 per year in Houston to just $72 per year in Cuenca.Jan Cottage’s health insurance dropped from $640 per month in COBRA payments in the U.S. to just $100 a month for private insurance in Ecuador.Even a year later, they marveled as they moved around their kitchen pointing out fruits, vegetables and a loaf of bread they bought for just a dollar, even less in some cases.There have been some hiccups. While Cuenca offers most of the amenities they were used too — such as widespread Internet service and DirectTV — there is a more relaxed vibe that took some getting used to.”I don’t think I would do people thinking about this justice without saying that this isn’t probably for everyone,” Jan Cottage said. “You have to be flexible here. If someone says they’re going to do something like show up to hang a chandelier tomorrow, tomorrow may be Wednesday of next week. So you have to be patient with all that.”The Cottages are just two of what some have coined “recession refugees” — Americans who left the country in search of a more affordable, yet still rewarding life.It’s a crunch many Americans have felt. The Social Security Administration sends monthly benefits to more than 346,000 Americans living overseas, an increase of nearly 47 percent from 10 years ago.In Cuenca, the Americans first came in a slow trickle. Then, in the last couple of years, a deluge of retirees began settling there. The mayor of Cuenca estimated 4,000 Americans were now living in his city of about half a million.”There has been a growth and, of course, it is complicated for us because, evidently, it makes it less accessible [for] Ecuadorians,” Cuenca Mayor Paul Granda told ABC News in an interview conducted in Spanish.Granda said prices in Cuenca have soared by as much as 40 or 50 percent, in some cases. He pointed not just to the Americans for the prices rising, but also the large number of Ecuadorians that had moved to the United States decades ago and were now bringing their families back.”The basic services are very cheap and of quality. Obviously we are also obligated to keep being more efficient,” Granda said. “But I think that the goal is how to make politics active so that that immigration fits in with our society and would be a contribution to our society.”The locals have been welcoming to the Americans. In Cuenca, the word “gringo” is a term of endearment, with many establishments even hosting “Gringo Nights” once a week.International Living magazine has named Ecuador a top retirement destination for five years in a row.Some of the Americans who are now living in Cuenca worry that the city will become too popular with expats.Edd and Cynthia Staton moved to Cuenca from Las Vegas about three years ago. They had always talked about retiring overseas, but their search began focusing on the more affordable South American countries after the recession forced both of them into early retirement.”We had an idea of the kind of retirement life we wanted,” said Cynthia Staton, 59. “And Cuenca seemed to check all those boxes.””We had the choices of accepting a lousy retirement, which wasn’t a choice, continuing to keep on keeping on like we’d always done before,” said Edd Staton, 64. “But there was no guarantee that was actually going to work. And if it didn’t work we would have given up perhaps the best 10 years of our life we had left.””Plan C,” he said, “was think of something else.””This is our something else,” she said. “And we couldn’t be happier. This was a great decision for us. “Their news raised some eyebrows among their family members, including their two children. But they pointed out that if they had chosen to stay in the U.S., they would have kept working to pay the bills. So they would be on a tight budget and get very little vacation time to visit their family, which is scattered across the country.Now they can visit the States for two to three weeks at a time. Living in Cuenca, Edd Staton pointed out, has meant that they’ve been able to see their children and, now, grandchildren more than they ever did living in Las Vegas.And they Skype daily.”With technology what it is, I think that you can move abroad and still feel connected to your family, whereas years ago that wasn’t possible,” Cynthia Staton said.Neither couple has any plans to move back to the U.S. Instead, they are just enjoying what they call the best years of their lives.”We certainly wanted to have this fling before we possibly physically can’t do that,” Jan Cottage said.It’s what Ecuadorians call “la tercera edad” — the third and, quite possibly, best chapter of their lives.
Here is a recent news blog post by the Huffington Post, link click here, on the compare of these two cities as a retirement spot, only you can decide but Kathleen Peddicod points out in her article there is no winner, it is your personal life style you wish. Read what she has to say, all good, both cities are great spot to retire in for South America. Photo above is Cuenca from Huffington Post.
Cuenca, Ecuador, and Medellin, Colombia, are two of the top retirement options in Latin America right now.
Which is better? Which one might be the right place for you to think about retiring overseas? Trying to answer those questions requires drawing some comparisons.
Both of these cities enjoy great weather, with no bugs, all year. Living in either place, you wouldn’t need to use heat or air conditioning, a big help with monthly utility bills.
That said, the weather is not the same in these two cities. Medellin is warmer, with daily highs averaging around 81 degrees Fahrenheit, lows in the 60s, and minor seasonal variation. In Cuenca, monthly average highs vary from 65 to 71 degrees, depending on the time of year, and nightly lows are likewise correspondingly lower.
Medellin sees more rain (66 inches annually versus 35 inches in Cuenca). At the same time, Medellin sees more sunny days, on average, annually, than Cuenca.
Does either of those descriptions qualify as “perfect weather” for you? As with all retire overseas factors, it’s a matter of your own preferences.
Residency is fairly easy to establish in both Colombia and Ecuador, with low thresholds for visa qualification in both countries. In Colombia, the pensioner’s visa requires an income of just under $1,000 per year, while in Ecuador the level is even lower, at $800 per year. For an investor-type visa, Colombia’s options start at around $34,000, while Ecuador requires but $25,000.
Colombia’s visa, however, is quicker and easier to obtain, with fewer documents required. Also, Ecuador imposes some restrictions on your travel during your first two years of residency in that country, while Colombia imposes no such restrictions at any time.
The cultural scene in Medellin is remarkably similar to that in Cuenca… which is to say that both of these cities are culturally rich. This is surprising because, while Medellin is home to about 4 million people, there are but 600,000 living in Cuenca. Still, in both cities, you can enjoy orchestra, theater, art openings, museums, and a generally sophisticated cultural scene. You’ll pay a modest fee for most of these things in Medellin, while in Cuenca they’re usually free.
The infrastructure is good in both cities. You’ll enjoy drinkable water, reliable broadband Internet, and dependable electricity, water, and phone service.
Also, both cities are very walkable, and both boast excellent and cheap public transit systems. And, if you decide to drive, you’ll find traffic jams equally maddening in both cities.
Real estate is a tremendous bargain in both cities, cheap for the region and on a global scale. Apples to apples insofar as that’s possible (that is, comparing comparable properties in comparable regions of each city), Medellin’s El Poblado neighborhood (the best address in the city and the place where most expat retirees are settling) is the winner. On a per-square-meter basis (which is the only reliable way to compare property prices between two places), prices in El Poblado are lower than prices in the best neighborhoods of Cuenca.
Bottom line, you can buy a nice, two-bedroom apartment in both these cities for less than $100,000.
For the lifestyle you’ll enjoy in Medellin, the cost of living is a tremendous bargain. The same is true in Cuenca–for the lifestyle it offers, it, too, is a great bargain.
However, the lifestyle in one is nothing like the lifestyle in the other, which brings us to the ways these cities differ. (As Medellin is such a big and diverse city, I’ll confine my comparisons to its El Poblado neighborhood, which, again, is likely where you would want to settle if you were to retire here.)
To start, Medellin’s El Poblado offers a modern, upscale ambiance. It has elegant shopping, state-of-the-art infrastructure, attractive new buildings, and many and diverse options for dining out. New, luxury, brick high-rises look down from wooded hillsides. Tall trees line the well-maintained streets and nicely landscaped parks. And El Poblado is only one of many such desirable areas in this city.
On the other hand, Cuenca is one of the Americas’ premier Spanish-colonial cities and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The old Cathedral was built in 1557, the architecture is well-preserved Spanish colonial, and the streets are cobblestoned. You’ll even see evidence of the Inca occupation from the early 1500s. Yet just outside the historic center, Cuenca also offers new, modern high-rises. So you can live in a modern home, yet have the historic center just a short distance away.
El Poblado is a First World environment; you’d be hard-pressed to find a U.S. city that can beat it. On the other hand, Cuenca is part of a developing country, where you see evidence of the Third World… things like sidewalks in poor repair and unmaintained structures.
Access to the United States is easier from Medellin than from Cuenca. You can fly direct to Medellin from Miami (flights are available daily), whereas you’ll need to connect (and probably spend the night) in Guayaquil or Quito when traveling to Cuenca. This adds a day to the trip coming and going, as well as the cost of lodging and taxis.
The expat community is far smaller in Medellin than in Cuenca. You can find expats in Medellin — at a local coffee shop or the Irish pub — if you look for them, but you won’t normally see your fellows around.
In Cuenca, the expat community has grown dramatically in the past few years especially. Today’s estimates put between 4,000 and 5,000 expats and foreign retirees in this city. They are making a cultural imprint. Most of their impact is positive, in my opinion, but whether an expat community of that size is a positive or a negative for you overall is, again, like all retire overseas factors, a matter of choice.
The cost of living is higher in El Poblado than in Cuenca, due in part to currency exchange rates. Ecuador uses the U.S. dollar, so dollar-holders don’t feel the pinch of a weakening currency in this country. Meantime, Colombia uses its own peso. The stronger it gets, the more dollars you need to maintain the same standard of living. Bottom line, your living costs in Medellin would be noticeably higher than in Cuenca.
That said, as I write, the U.S. dollar is at a 16-month high against the Colombian peso, making a real estate purchase in Medellin more appealing right now than ever.
A basic budget for Medellin might be $1,750 per month (food, entertainment, utilities, public transit, taxes, and HOA fees). In Cuenca, figure about $1,250 per month. Neither city is expensive, but Cuenca is definitely more affordable.
All things considered, the winner is?
There is no winner. Neither city is “better.” Manhattan is not inherently better or worse than New Orleans, say, but it’s certainly different. The same goes for Medellin and Cuenca.
I see Cuenca as an adventure, a cultural adventure. It offers a lifestyle that’s as different as you can get from the United States or Canada without leaving the world’s European-based cultures.
Medellin, on the other hand, could be perceived as a reward destination. A pretty, pleasant, comfortable place to live, a place where it’s a treat to spend time. In Medellin, you can embrace a sophisticated, elegant lifestyle, the kind of lifestyle that most retirees wouldn’t be able to afford in the United States.
This is one more RED FLAG for me to consider moving to Ecuador, where the government really does not wish your presents, your persona non grada
Do you really want to move to Ecuador?? Think about it !!
Correa has been criticized by international groups for cruelly silencing journalists and critics of his administration. The South American leader also supported former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and has been actively strengthening his relationship with Iran and Syria.
the full story below
Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa said that American exceptionalism is reminiscent of Nazism “before and during World War II.”
“Does not this remind you of the Nazis’ rhetoric before and during World War II? They considered themselves the chosen race, the superior race, etc. Such words and ideas pose extreme danger,” Correa told RT Spanish.
Correa referred to President Barack Obama’s statement that “America is exceptional” because it stands up for the world’s interests not just its own. However, Correa said that the U.S. has and will continue to violate international law.
“What Plato wrote in his [Socratic] dialogues more than 2,000 years ago is true. Justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger. They are strong, that’s why they will continue lying, violating other states’ sovereignty, and breaching international law. But one day this unjust world will have to change,” Correa said, adding that the United Nation’s headquarters should eventually be moved from New York City.
“The headquarters of the organization is in the U.S. and they finance their activities,” Correa said. “This is outrageous and an example of a relationship the US established with developing countries in the form of subordination.”
Correa has been criticized by international groups for cruelly silencing journalists and critics of his administration. The South American leader also supported former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and has been actively strengthening his relationship with Iran and Syria.
RT also asked Correa about the country’s pending $19 billion case against the oil giant Chevron. Ecuador and a coalition of trial lawyers have been battling Chevron for decades for alleged damages by Texaco, now a Chevron subsidiary, while they were drilling in the country during.
“Chevron has caused irreparable damage to the Ecuadorian jungle,” Correa said. “Texaco did nothing to clear the area. … At the time, there were cleaner technologies available, but they wanted to save a few bucks, and they destroyed the environment and did not even bother to pay for the damages.”
However, the case has been plagued with allegations of corruption, and key witnesses and case experts have switched sides and admitted to manipulating data to favor a judgment against Chevron.
In April, Stratus Consulting and the company’s managing scientist Ann Maest admitted to providing false statements in the $19 billion lawsuit against Chevron. Maest and Stratus claimed that they had been misled by a plaintiffs’ lawyer and disavowed an environmental impact report as “tainted.”
“I now believe that the damages assessment in the Cabrera Report and Cabrera Response is tainted. Therefore, I disavow any and all findings and conclusions in all of my reports and testimony on the Ecuador Project,” said Ann Maest, managing scientist for Stratus, in a court declaration.
Stratus was hired by trial lawyer Steven Donziger, who is representing Ecuadorian villagers against Chevron. The environmental impact report was ordered to be written by an independent expert, but was instead written by Stratus.
The company said that Donziger ordered that portions of the report detailing the environmental damages be drafted in the first person to appear as if it were written by the court-appointed independent expert.
“Donziger stressed to me and Ann Maest the importance of Stratus ensuring that no one learn of Stratus’ involvement in any aspect of the Cabrera Report or Responses,” said the consulting firm’s executive vice president.
Chevron has filed a countersuit against Donziger and his fellow plaintiffs, accusing them of fraud and racketeering. That case will be heard in the coming weeks.
Last December, Ecuadorian author and engineer Fernando Reyes switched sides in the case against Chevron, handing over a sworn statement to Chevron that accused the lawyers suing the company of trying to manipulate and control the outcome of supposedly “independent” court reports on oil field contamination in Ecuador.
Reyes was asked by Donziger to review environmental tests by court-appointed experts, but was instructed not to tell the court that he was being paid by the plaintiffs. Reyes said in his sworn statement that three of the lawyers “acknowledged that the judicial inspection process had not yielded data to support their claims of contamination.”
“During our discussions, Mr. Dozinger (sic) told us that our report should establish that the findings of the settling experts’ report … were wrong, that they lacked objectivity and were biased toward Chevron, and therefore the report should be discounted,” said Reyes. “However, in my professional opinion the evidence did not support Mr. Donziger’s position and I could not twist my professional assessments to make them fit the plaintiffs’ interests.”
The U.S. Agency for International Development announced on Friday that it would withdraw from Ecuador after President Rafael Correa prohibited the introduction of additional aid programs aimed at strengthening civil society.
Acting USAID mission director Christopher Cushing said the move was “a result of the Government of Ecuador’s decision to prohibit approval of new USAID assistance programs.”
Observers said the move was indicative of the continued regression of political freedoms in Ecuador, which, as part of Latin America’s Bolivarian socialist bloc, is increasingly hostile towards the United States.
The Ecuadorian government has accused USAID of supporting “opponents of the Citizens’ Revolution,” who allegedly include journalists and non-governmental organizations that have criticized the Correa regime.
According to a letter from Cushing obtained by the Christian Science Monitor, the regime “informed USAID it could not execute any new assistance activities or extend existing activities pending negotiation of a new agreement governing bilateral assistance.”
The decision capped months of tensions between Quito and USAID. Correa has threatened to expel the agency for years, though he insists that all USAID-supported projects are the property of the Ecuadorian government.
Ana Quintana, an expert on Latin America at the Heritage Foundation, said USAID’s departure should be interpreted in light of larger regional trends. She called the move “another win for the socialist ALBA bloc.”
ALBA is the Spanish acronym for the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America.
“Led by Venezuela, the organization is collectively working to rid the region of the U.S.’s influence and solidify their 21st century socialist movement,” Quintana said. “Virtually all member states have kicked out U.S. ambassadors, shut down DEA operations despite the region’s prevailing drug trafficking problems, and are now targeting U.S. development programs.”
Correa has frequently accused USAID of advancing U.S. interests in Ecuador by funding groups that supposedly undermine his administration and his larger political agenda in Latin America.
One recent target of Correa’s ire was César Ricaurte, director of Fundamedios, an Ecuadorian NGO that advocates freedom of speech and press in the country.
El Cuidadano, the government’s official news organ, has attacked Fundamedios and Ricaurte as “opponents of the Citizens’ Revolution” and claimed that the group’s work “lacks technical rigor, verification, and checking of sources.”
El Cuidadano has rejected allegations from Fundamedios that the government marginalizes journalists who criticize Correa on the grounds that the group receives funding from USAID.
The group most recently documented a police raid on the home of an Ecuadorian journalist who exposed corruption in the country’s oil sector.
Other international observers such as the Committee to Protect Journalists have leveled similar accusations regarding Ecuador’s disregard for press freedoms.
Quintana worries that USAID’s departure from Ecuador will hamper the type of oversight that groups like Fundamedios provide.
“Following in the footsteps of Cuba and Venezuela, [Correa] has been systematically repressing freedom of speech by criminalizing dissenting opinion,” Quintana said.
USAID also drew fire from the Correa administration by working with indigenous groups that protested the sale of oil rights in the Amazon.
Efforts by the Correa administration to shut down USAID-supported environmentalist NGOs representing indigenous groups have been rebuked even by strong supporters of Correa’s brand of Bolivarian socialism.
“These activists are … seeing something all too familiar: a state seemingly using its power to weaken dissent,” wrote Canadian socialist Naomi Klein in an open letter to Correa in 2009.
Correa has used USAID’s support for the groups to tar them as organs of the U.S. government working to undermine “internal state security” and “public peace.”
Bolivian president Evo Morales leveled similar accusations before expelling USAID from the country.
“The political climate in Ecuador and the rest of the anti-American contingent should be continuously monitored,” Quintana said.
“In light of the deterioration of Venezuela’s economy, ALBA member states will continue subversive actions against the U.S. in exchange for the friendly regimes of China and Iran.”
Correa recently attacked the “corrupt” Washington Free Beacon for a report that detailed the government’s ties to a company attempting to silence critics of the regime.
A subsequent attack by El Cuidadano did not dispute any of the Free Beacon’s actual reporting.